Kisebbségvédelem / Minority Protection

Permanent URI for this community

https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14834/11860
A Kisebbségvédelem (HU ISSN 2676 – 8992) a Károli Gáspár Református Egyetem tudományos folyóirata, mely Európa őshonos nemzeti közösségeinek aktuális helyzetével, valamint a kisebbségvédelem egyéb releváns területeivel kapcsolatos tanulmányokat hivatott közölni. A folyóirat elsősorban a témával kapcsolatos jogi elemzésekre fókuszál, de az interdiszciplinaritásra törekedve bátorítjuk különösen a politikatudomány, szociológia, történettudomány és egyéb humán tudományok kutatóit, hogy tematikalag ide illő írásaikat nyújtsák be a Szerkesztőséghez, mely az egész év folyamán nyitva áll a szerzők előtt. Célunk, hogy a hagyományos európai nemzeti közösségekre vonatkozó tudományos gondolkodást, valamint a témával foglalkozó kutatók közti eszmecserét elősegítsük. A folyóirat a dupla anonim lektorálás (double-blind peer review) folyamatát alkalmazza.

News

https://portal.kre.hu/index.php/kiadvanyok/folyoiratok/kisebbsegvedelem.html

Browse

Browsing Kisebbségvédelem / Minority Protection by Issue Date

Filter results by year or month
Now showing 1 - 20 of 31
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Open Access
    Kisebbségvédelem / Minority Protection, I. (2019)
    (Kisebbségi Jogvédő Intézet, 2019) Dabis Attila; Benda Vivien; Wágner Tamás
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Open Access
    Kisebbségvédelem / Minority Protection, II. (2020)
    (Kisebbségi Jogvédő Intézet, 2020) Dabis Attila; Benda Vivien; Wágner Tamás
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Open Access
    Minority Protection. Special issue
    (Kisebbségi Jogvédő Intézet, 2020) Dabis Attila; Benda Vivien; Wágner Tamás
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Open Access
    Kisebbségvédelem. Különszám
    (Kisebbségi Jogvédő Intézet, 2020) Dabis Attila; Benda Vivien; Wágner Tamás
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Open Access
    Kisebbségvédelem / Minority Protection, III. (2021)
    (Kisebbségi Jogvédő Intézet, 2021) Dabis Attila; Benda Vivien; Wágner Tamás
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Open Access
    Kisebbségvédelem / Minority Protection, IV. (2021)
    (Kisebbségi Jogvédő Intézet, 2021) Dabis Attila; Benda Vivien; Wágner Tamás
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Open Access
    Kisebbségvédelem / Minority Protection, VI. (2022)
    (Kisebbségi Jogvédő Intézet, 2022) Dabis Attila
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Open Access
    Kisebbségvédelem / Minority Protection, V. (2022)
    (Kisebbségi Jogvédő Intézet, 2022) Dabis Attila
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Open Access
    Kisebbségvédelem / Minority Protection, VII. (2023)
    (Károli Gáspár Református Egyetem, 2023) Dabis Attila; Manzinger Krisztián; Károli Gáspár Református Egyetem
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Open Access
    Kisebbségvédelem / Minority Protection, VIII. (2023)
    (Károli Gáspár Református Egyetem, 2023) Dabis Attila; Manzinger Krisztián; Károli Gáspár Református Egyetem
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Open Access
    Kisebbségvédelem / Minority Protection, X. (2024)
    (Károli Gáspár Református Egyetem, 2024) Dabis Attila; Manzinger Krisztián; Károli Gáspár Református Egyetem
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Open Access
    Kisebbségvédelem / Minority Protection, IX. (2024)
    (Károli Gáspár Református Egyetem, 2024) Dabis Attila; Manzinger Krisztián; Károli Gáspár Református Egyetem
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Open Access
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Open Access
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Open Access
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Open Access
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Open Access
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Open Access
    Dual roles and rights implications. The unsettled dynamics of AI use in relation to minoritised communities
    (Károli Gáspár Református Egyetem, 2025) Dabis Attila; Corvinus Egyetem
    This paper explores the volatile relationship between artificial intelligence (AI) tools and minoritised communities, addressing the primary research question: In what ways does the deployment of AI technologies in both democratic and authoritarian contexts affect minoritised groups, particularly regarding bias, discrimination, human rights violations, and the preservation or erosion of cultural and linguistic identities? The study utilises a mixed-methods approach, integrating content analysis of international human rights instruments and relevant scholarly literature with case studies, such as the implementation of AI-driven surveillance on the Uyghur community in China or various instances of language revitalisation supported by AI tools. The research underscores the dual nature of AI applications. On the one hand, AI tools can be employed for oppressive measures, including ethnic profiling, extensive surveillance, and cultural oppression, as demonstrated in the Uyghur case. Conversely, AI offers promising avenues for preserving the identity of minoritised communities, par ticularly through language revitalisation and cultural preservation, fostering inclusivity and empowering marginalised populations within digital environments. This study aims to contribute to the underexplored intersection of AI and minoritised communities by presenting an interdiscipli nary perspective that connects AI development with the protection of minority rights. The findings emphasise the necessity of a humanrights-based framework in AI design and implementation, highlighting the potential for AI to enhance the empowerment of minoritised communities while also recognising the dangers of exploitation in authoritarian regimes.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Open Access
    Az őshonos kisebbségek aktuális helyzete Franciaországban. A Nyelvi Charta ratifikációjának kérdése és a Molac-törvény
    (Károli Gáspár Református Egyetem, 2025) Collet-Retkes Dorottya; KRE - Állam- és Jogtudományi Doktori Iskola
    This paper examines the legal and political status of France’s traditional minority languages by analysing the constitutional constraints that hinder the protection of linguistic rights and explaining why France has repeatedly failed to ratify the 1992 European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages. Using a doctrinal legal method supported by the qualitative analysis of arliamentary debates, constitutional case law and the historical evolution of French language policy, the study compares French constitutional principles with European minority protection norms and identifies the structural tensions between them. The findings show that France’s constitutional framework, particularly the principles of state indivisibility and the exclusive status of the French language, systematically blocks the recognition of collective linguistic rights, which in turn explains both the unsuccessful ratification attempts of the Charter and the Constitutional Council’s 2021 annulment of key provisions of the Molac Law. By integrating legal, political, and historical perspectives, the paper demonstrates that these structural constraints continue to impede the meaningful protection of regional languages and argues that overcoming this constitutional barrier is essential not only for safeguarding France’s linguistic heritage but also for reinforcing Europe’s broader minority rights architecture.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Open Access
    Kísérletek a magyarországi nemzetiségi kérdés rendezésére, 1848-1918
    (Károli Gáspár Református Egyetem, 2025) Jeszenszky Géza; Corvinus Egyetem
    This study investigates whether earlier and more substantive political compromise between Hungary and its non-Hungarian nationalities could have prevented the disintegration of the historic kingdom by 1918. It asks how successive attempts at accommodation, from 1848 to the 1868 Nationalities Law, addressed the demands of emerging national movements and why they ultimately failed. Methodologically, the analysis relies on a close reading of primary legal and parliamentary documents (1848, 1861, 1868), contemporary political writings (Eötvös, Kemény, Kossuth, Teleki), and later historiography, particularly the syntheses of Katus László and Szarka László, which draw on archival sources and parliamentary records. These materials facilitate a comparative assessment of constitutional proposals, nationality programs, and the political constraints that shape them. The findings show that meaningful compromise was repeatedly conceivable, most clearly in 1861, yet systematically derailed by conflicting territorial claims, the mixed ethnic geography of the Carpathian Basin, and the Hungarian political elite’s insistence on a unitary political nation. Although the 1868 law represented a liberal milestone in individual rights, it lacked mechanisms for enforcing collective protections and was inconsistently implemented, accelerating political estrangement. The study’s value lies in reframing Hungary’s nationality policy as a series of missed historic openings rather than a linear path to the Treaty of Trianon. Understanding these aborted settlements sheds light on why constructive minority accommodation failed in a region where linguistic, territorial, and political claims overlapped, providing insights that remain relevant for contemporary Central European minority governance.